Understanding Termination of Parental Rights in Nevada and Its Implications
- Feb 12
- 4 min read
Updated: Feb 19
This article is for informational purposes only and
is not to be construed as legal advice.

What Parents Need to Know About the Process, the Law, and Their Options
Termination of parental rights (TPR) is one of the most serious civil actions that can occur in Nevada Family Court. It permanently ends the legal relationship between a parent and a child. Once rights are terminated, the parent no longer has the legal ability to visit, communicate with, or make decisions for the child. The child may then
be adopted. This article is based on and references “A Parent’s Guide: How to Effectively Handle Your Termination of Parental Rights Case,” written and published by the Office of the Clark County Special Public Defender, Family Defense Project. The guide provides a structured overview of how these cases work and what parents can expect throughout the process. If you are facing a TPR case, understanding the framework of Nevada law and the court’s expectations is critical.
Termination of Parental Rights Is a Civil Case — Not a Criminal Case
One of the first clarifications the guide makes is that a termination case is a civil action, not a criminal prosecution. You cannot be jailed simply because your parental rights are terminated. However, statements made during a TPR case can potentially be used in related criminal proceedings. That distinction matters. Anything said to investigators, caseworkers, therapists, or evaluators may become evidence. Only communications with your attorney are confidential. That is a critical procedural reality.
How These Cases Begin
Under Nevada law, when a child is removed from a parent’s home, the State must file an abuse or neglect complaint within ten days. After that initial phase, the Department of Family Services (DFS) is generally required to make “reasonable efforts” toward reunification before pursuing termination. A permanency hearing must typically be held within 12 months of removal. If the child has been in foster care for 14 of any 20 months, Nevada law creates a presumption that termination may be in the child’s best interest. That timeline drives the case.
The Legal Standard: A Two-Part Test
Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 128 governs termination cases. The court must apply a two-part test:
Is termination in the best interests of the child?
Has the parent failed to correct the conditions that led to removal?
The State must prove its case by “clear and convincing evidence,” which is the highest burden in a civil matter. If the statutory time limits are met (14 out of 20 months), certain presumptions shift the burden to the parent to demonstrate correction of conditions.
What “Best Interests of the Child” Means
The phrase “best interests of the child” is defined in Nevada law and includes factors such as:
Services provided to the parent
The child’s physical, mental, and emotional condition
The parents’ efforts to adjust circumstances
Payment of support, if financially able
Regular visitation and communication
Whether additional services would likely result in lasting parental adjustment
Token or incidental efforts are not enough.
Grounds for Termination
The guide outlines statutory grounds that may justify termination, including:
Abandonment
Certain felony convictions indicating parental unfitness
Emotional or mental illness rendering the inability to parent
Chronic substance abuse
Failure to provide adequate care
Failure of parental adjustment
Failure to reunify within statutory timelines
Each ground must be proven by evidence.
Court Appearances and Defaults
If you fail to appear at a hearing or trial, a default may be entered against you. While a default can sometimes be vacated, that is within the judge’s discretion and requires legitimate justification. Attendance is essential.
Court-Ordered Evaluations Are Not Therapy
Court-ordered psychological evaluations are not confidential therapy sessions. Evaluators prepare written reports that may be used in court. Cooperation, presentation, and candor during evaluations can significantly affect the outcome of a case.
Visitation and Documentation
The guide stresses the importance of consistent visitation. Parents are encouraged to attend every visit, follow rules, and document efforts. Regular and meaningful contact demonstrates commitment and may influence the court’s assessment.
Your Options
According to the guide, parents generally have four options:
Contest termination and proceed to trial.
Seek placement with a relative.
Request legal guardianship.
Voluntarily relinquish parental rights (including open adoption agreements).
Voluntary relinquishment is permanent and cannot be reversed.
Trial and Appeal
At trial, both sides present evidence and witnesses. The judge determines whether the statutory standards are met. Appeals are possible but typically focus on legal error rather than factual disputes.
After Termination
If parental rights are terminated, contact ends unless adoptive parents agree otherwise. A final visit may be requested. The Nevada Adoption Reunion Registry may provide limited future options for contact. The consequences are permanent.
Source Reference: This article is based on information contained in “A Parent’s Guide: How to Effectively Handle Your Termination of Parental Rights Case,” written and published by the Office of the Clark County Special Public Defender, Family Defense Project.
Again, this is not legal advice. It is a general summary of publicly available informational material.
I am not an attorney in the state of Nevada.
I am not authorized to give legal advice or legal representation.
I may not accept fees for giving legal advice or legal representation.






Comments